Referring clinicians and test volume, joined to the facilities already in the market.

Part B diagnostic service volume, Medicare-certified facility inventory, named referring-clinician utilization, PLACES prevalence, and health center locations for the geography you name.

Why this market needs sourced data

Lab and imaging growth is a referral-capture problem. The order-writing clinicians and the competing facilities are both in the public record.

Joining service volume to a named provider list produces a call order that reflects actual test-ordering behavior.

What you get, with examples

Order volume by service

Part B service records quantify diagnostic volume by procedure and geography.

Example
Compare advanced imaging volume across neighboring states.

Referring clinicians ranked

Named provider utilization identifies the physicians whose ordering pattern drives the market.

Example
Top 40 ordering clinicians within 30 miles of a new imaging site.

Competitive inventory

Provider-of-services and health center files map facility supply, including FQHCs that route testing.

Example
Count independent facilities versus system-owned in the county.

Burden-based prioritization

Chronic disease prevalence indicates which panels and modalities carry demand locally.

Example
Prioritize counties with high diabetes prevalence for a screening program.

Questions you can ask

How much diagnostic volume runs through this state by service?

Which clinicians order the most in our catchment?

How many competing facilities operate in this county?

Where is chronic disease prevalence highest here?

Topics this page covers

  • lab and imaging referral targeting
  • diagnostic test volume by state
  • imaging center competition by county
  • referring physician ranking data
  • disease prevalence by county

Related solutions

Build the diagnostics, labs and imaging list for one county and check the names yourself.

Three runs free. Every row carries its source, vintage and rank reason. See pricing.

Start free