Free · Public CMS data

Spravato compliance risk scores, year on year

In 2024, 76 providers billed esketamine under Medicare Part B fee-for-service, with an average compliance risk score of 8 against 9 in 2023. 34 providers appear in both years: 12 scored higher, 15 scored lower and 7 were unchanged. 42 providers are new to the 2024 file and 12 billed in 2023 but not in 2024. The score is built only from public CMS billing patterns against FDA esketamine label dosing. It is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Prioritising outreach in this market? Create a free account to turn this public data into a territory call plan — 3 free runs, no card.

Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners — by Provider and Service. Data years 2024 and 2023. HCPCS G2082 and G2083.

Where providers sit by risk band

Provider counts in each band, 2023 against 2024. CMS Part B public use file.

Band20232024Share
High000%
Elevated000%
Moderate000%
Low4676100%

Highest sessions per patient relative to the label, 2024

The 25 providers with the highest compliance risk score. This is a transparency ranking of billing patterns, not an assessment of care quality or conduct.

#ProviderStateScore2023ChangeSessions / patientFlags
1James RushTX
24 · Low
17+732.6
none
2David BoguslavskyNJ
23 · Low
21+220.6
3Lynne LyonsMI
23 · Low
24-130.5
none
4Kalappurackal JosephMI
22 · Low
not in filenew29.0
none
5Andrew LeblancMI
20 · Low
12+826.1
none
6Melissa RademacherIA
18 · Low
15+313.8
7Mohamad BahnassiMA
16 · Low
not in filenew21.3
none
8Horacio CapoteNY
15 · Low
12+320.4
none
9Brian BoyleMA
14 · Low
19-519.2
none
10Francisco DofelizNV
14 · Low
24-108.1
11Marty BennettTX
14 · Low
12+218.9
none
12Remigiusz DrozdCA
14 · Low
not in filenew7.9
13Satish NarayanTX
14 · Low
not in filenew19.1
none
14Trever KrehbielKS
14 · Low
17-318.8
none
15Leyda HuNY
13 · Low
not in filenew7.2
16Paul CoreyCA
13 · Low
13no change7.2
17Linda VarelaNJ
12 · Low
not in filenew5.7
18Mark HilliardIA
12 · Low
10+25.4
19Benjamin YudkoffMA
11 · Low
not in filenew15.2
none
20Jaimee O'connorNY
11 · Low
not in filenew4.1
21Jonathan BeattyPA
11 · Low
not in filenew15.1
none
22Michael BanovGA
11 · Low
10+115.1
none
23Tyler KjorvestadKS
11 · Low
not in filenew14.8
none
24Yoojin NaNY
11 · Low
not in filenew3.4
25Cheryl MalinaNY
10 · Low
12-22.8

Biggest score movements

Providers present in both 2023 and 2024, ranked by how far their score moved.

Largest increases

Score rose between 2023 and 2024

ProviderPriorNowChange
Andrew LeblancMI1220+8
James RushTX1724+7
Melissa RademacherIA1518+3
Horacio CapoteNY1215+3
Kaila ComptonCA58+3
David BoguslavskyNJ2123+2
Marty BennettTX1214+2
Mark HilliardIA1012+2
Nathan JohnstonTX79+2
Ivan CichowiczFL46+2

Largest decreases

Score fell between 2023 and 2024

ProviderPriorNowChange
Francisco DofelizNV2414-10
Brian BoyleMA1914-5
Aaron SianiCA117-4
Trever KrehbielKS1714-3
Cheryl MalinaNY1210-2
Haviva MalinaNY119-2
William UpshawFL108-2
Lawrence CohenCA53-2
David FeifelCA42-2
Lynne LyonsMI2423-1

Entering and leaving the file

A provider can leave the file because they stopped billing esketamine, or because their volume fell under the CMS suppression threshold of eleven patients. CMS does not tell us which.

New in 2024

42 providers, not present in 2023

Not in the 2024 file

12 providers billed in 2023 only

How the score works, and what it does not mean

The 0–100 score

Most of the score reflects sessions per Medicare patient measured against the 56-session ceiling implied by the FDA esketamine label. The remainder comes from billing flags, weighted more heavily when they are hard flags such as same-day duplicate claims.

Bands: High, Elevated, Moderate, Low — High is 70 and above, Elevated 50 to 69, Moderate 25 to 49, Low below 25.

What it is not

It is not an audit finding, an accusation or a quality measure. Sicker panels, group NPIs that blend several prescribers, patients carried over from a prior year and CMS suppression all move the number without anything being wrong.

Read the flag guide or the full provider report for the detail behind each number.

Questions about this data

What is the compliance risk score?

A 0–100 score built only from public CMS billing data. Most of it comes from how a provider's sessions per Medicare patient compare with the FDA esketamine label, and the rest from billing flags such as same-day duplicate claims or billing under a group NPI.

Does a high score mean a provider did something wrong?

No. A high score means the billing pattern sits far from label dosing or carries flags worth understanding. There are legitimate clinical and administrative explanations, including sicker panels, group billing that blends several prescribers and patients who started treatment in a prior year. Nothing here is evidence of wrongdoing.

Why do scores change between years?

Sessions per patient, patient counts and flags are recalculated for each data year independently. A score can move because dosing changed, because the patient panel grew or shrank, or because CMS suppressed part of the prior year's activity.

Why are some providers listed as new?

They appear in the latest data year but not the earlier one. That usually means a clinic started billing esketamine under Medicare Part B, or their earlier volume fell below the CMS suppression threshold of eleven patients.

What data is behind this page?

The CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners by Provider and Service public use file, filtered to HCPCS codes G2082 and G2083 and aggregated by rendering NPI. Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and commercial payers are not included.

Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners — by Provider and Service, HCPCS G2082 and G2083, aggregated by rendering NPI. Medicare fee-for-service only: Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and commercial payers are excluded, and CMS suppresses provider-code combinations with fewer than 11 patients. Values CMS does not publish are shown as not reported, never as zero.

Build the list for one county and see whether the names are right.

Ask in plain language. RepVector finds the universe, enriches each target from its own website, scores it 0–100, and hands you a ranked call list with phones, addresses and named contacts.

Build a target list free

3 free runs — no card required.