Spravato compliance risk scores, year on year
In 2024, 76 providers billed esketamine under Medicare Part B fee-for-service, with an average compliance risk score of 8 against 9 in 2023. 34 providers appear in both years: 12 scored higher, 15 scored lower and 7 were unchanged. 42 providers are new to the 2024 file and 12 billed in 2023 but not in 2024. The score is built only from public CMS billing patterns against FDA esketamine label dosing. It is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Prioritising outreach in this market? Create a free account to turn this public data into a territory call plan — 3 free runs, no card.
Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners — by Provider and Service. Data years 2024 and 2023. HCPCS G2082 and G2083.
Where providers sit by risk band
Provider counts in each band, 2023 against 2024. CMS Part B public use file.
| Band | 2023 | 2024 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Elevated | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Moderate | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Low | 46 | 76 | 100% |
Highest sessions per patient relative to the label, 2024
The 25 providers with the highest compliance risk score. This is a transparency ranking of billing patterns, not an assessment of care quality or conduct.
| # | Provider | State | Score | 2023 | Change | Sessions / patient | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Rush | TX | 24 · Low | 17 | +7 | 32.6 | none |
| 2 | David Boguslavsky | NJ | 23 · Low | 21 | +2 | 20.6 | |
| 3 | Lynne Lyons | MI | 23 · Low | 24 | -1 | 30.5 | none |
| 4 | Kalappurackal Joseph | MI | 22 · Low | not in file | new | 29.0 | none |
| 5 | Andrew Leblanc | MI | 20 · Low | 12 | +8 | 26.1 | none |
| 6 | Melissa Rademacher | IA | 18 · Low | 15 | +3 | 13.8 | |
| 7 | Mohamad Bahnassi | MA | 16 · Low | not in file | new | 21.3 | none |
| 8 | Horacio Capote | NY | 15 · Low | 12 | +3 | 20.4 | none |
| 9 | Brian Boyle | MA | 14 · Low | 19 | -5 | 19.2 | none |
| 10 | Francisco Dofeliz | NV | 14 · Low | 24 | -10 | 8.1 | |
| 11 | Marty Bennett | TX | 14 · Low | 12 | +2 | 18.9 | none |
| 12 | Remigiusz Drozd | CA | 14 · Low | not in file | new | 7.9 | |
| 13 | Satish Narayan | TX | 14 · Low | not in file | new | 19.1 | none |
| 14 | Trever Krehbiel | KS | 14 · Low | 17 | -3 | 18.8 | none |
| 15 | Leyda Hu | NY | 13 · Low | not in file | new | 7.2 | |
| 16 | Paul Corey | CA | 13 · Low | 13 | no change | 7.2 | |
| 17 | Linda Varela | NJ | 12 · Low | not in file | new | 5.7 | |
| 18 | Mark Hilliard | IA | 12 · Low | 10 | +2 | 5.4 | |
| 19 | Benjamin Yudkoff | MA | 11 · Low | not in file | new | 15.2 | none |
| 20 | Jaimee O'connor | NY | 11 · Low | not in file | new | 4.1 | |
| 21 | Jonathan Beatty | PA | 11 · Low | not in file | new | 15.1 | none |
| 22 | Michael Banov | GA | 11 · Low | 10 | +1 | 15.1 | none |
| 23 | Tyler Kjorvestad | KS | 11 · Low | not in file | new | 14.8 | none |
| 24 | Yoojin Na | NY | 11 · Low | not in file | new | 3.4 | |
| 25 | Cheryl Malina | NY | 10 · Low | 12 | -2 | 2.8 |
Biggest score movements
Providers present in both 2023 and 2024, ranked by how far their score moved.
Largest increases
Score rose between 2023 and 2024
| Provider | Prior | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew LeblancMI | 12 | 20 | +8 |
| James RushTX | 17 | 24 | +7 |
| Melissa RademacherIA | 15 | 18 | +3 |
| Horacio CapoteNY | 12 | 15 | +3 |
| Kaila ComptonCA | 5 | 8 | +3 |
| David BoguslavskyNJ | 21 | 23 | +2 |
| Marty BennettTX | 12 | 14 | +2 |
| Mark HilliardIA | 10 | 12 | +2 |
| Nathan JohnstonTX | 7 | 9 | +2 |
| Ivan CichowiczFL | 4 | 6 | +2 |
Largest decreases
Score fell between 2023 and 2024
| Provider | Prior | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco DofelizNV | 24 | 14 | -10 |
| Brian BoyleMA | 19 | 14 | -5 |
| Aaron SianiCA | 11 | 7 | -4 |
| Trever KrehbielKS | 17 | 14 | -3 |
| Cheryl MalinaNY | 12 | 10 | -2 |
| Haviva MalinaNY | 11 | 9 | -2 |
| William UpshawFL | 10 | 8 | -2 |
| Lawrence CohenCA | 5 | 3 | -2 |
| David FeifelCA | 4 | 2 | -2 |
| Lynne LyonsMI | 24 | 23 | -1 |
Entering and leaving the file
A provider can leave the file because they stopped billing esketamine, or because their volume fell under the CMS suppression threshold of eleven patients. CMS does not tell us which.
New in 2024
42 providers, not present in 2023
- Kalappurackal JosephMI22 · Low
- Mohamad BahnassiMA16 · Low
- Remigiusz DrozdCA14 · Low
- Satish NarayanTX14 · Low
- Leyda HuNY13 · Low
- Linda VarelaNJ12 · Low
- Benjamin YudkoffMA11 · Low
- Jaimee O'connorNY11 · Low
- Jonathan BeattyPA11 · Low
- Tyler KjorvestadKS11 · Low
- Yoojin NaNY11 · Low
- Rhonda ForestNY10 · Low
- Sandeep GuptaDE10 · Low
- Brendon NacewiczWI9 · Low
- Stephen RamondinoCA9 · Low
Not in the 2024 file
12 providers billed in 2023 only
- Jeffrey RichmondCO14 · Low
- Anoosh JavaherianCA12 · Low
- Amir RadCA11 · Low
- Beverly ChangCA10 · Low
- Teresa PoprawskiIL10 · Low
- Yanchun ZhangNJ10 · Low
- Shannan LarsonIA9 · Low
- Yana Bojilova NormanOR8 · Low
- Jennifer BrayOR8 · Low
- Robert OlsenOR6 · Low
- Rajiv RadhakrishnanCT3 · Low
- Samuel WilkinsonCT1 · Low
How the score works, and what it does not mean
The 0–100 score
Most of the score reflects sessions per Medicare patient measured against the 56-session ceiling implied by the FDA esketamine label. The remainder comes from billing flags, weighted more heavily when they are hard flags such as same-day duplicate claims.
Bands: High, Elevated, Moderate, Low — High is 70 and above, Elevated 50 to 69, Moderate 25 to 49, Low below 25.
What it is not
It is not an audit finding, an accusation or a quality measure. Sicker panels, group NPIs that blend several prescribers, patients carried over from a prior year and CMS suppression all move the number without anything being wrong.
Read the flag guide or the full provider report for the detail behind each number.
Questions about this data
What is the compliance risk score?
A 0–100 score built only from public CMS billing data. Most of it comes from how a provider's sessions per Medicare patient compare with the FDA esketamine label, and the rest from billing flags such as same-day duplicate claims or billing under a group NPI.
Does a high score mean a provider did something wrong?
No. A high score means the billing pattern sits far from label dosing or carries flags worth understanding. There are legitimate clinical and administrative explanations, including sicker panels, group billing that blends several prescribers and patients who started treatment in a prior year. Nothing here is evidence of wrongdoing.
Why do scores change between years?
Sessions per patient, patient counts and flags are recalculated for each data year independently. A score can move because dosing changed, because the patient panel grew or shrank, or because CMS suppressed part of the prior year's activity.
Why are some providers listed as new?
They appear in the latest data year but not the earlier one. That usually means a clinic started billing esketamine under Medicare Part B, or their earlier volume fell below the CMS suppression threshold of eleven patients.
What data is behind this page?
The CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners by Provider and Service public use file, filtered to HCPCS codes G2082 and G2083 and aggregated by rendering NPI. Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and commercial payers are not included.
Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners — by Provider and Service, HCPCS G2082 and G2083, aggregated by rendering NPI. Medicare fee-for-service only: Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and commercial payers are excluded, and CMS suppresses provider-code combinations with fewer than 11 patients. Values CMS does not publish are shown as not reported, never as zero.
Build the list for one county and see whether the names are right.
Ask in plain language. RepVector finds the universe, enriches each target from its own website, scores it 0–100, and hands you a ranked call list with phones, addresses and named contacts.
3 free runs — no card required.
